Skip to content

2. The Truth Lies in the Laws of Nature

I wanted to base my search for the origin of illness on something that is absolutely reliable and cannot be denied. I needed a clear yardstick for this. In general, there are two types of information that people can perceive.

  1. On the one hand, there is information that is self-explanatory. It proves itself and therefore requires no interpretation. Such information includes objects, structures, functions and means. For example, that water freezes is unambiguous and self-explanatory. The laws of nature prove themselves. All this objective information is learned because it is true. They do not need to be specifically tested.

  2. There is also information that needs to be interpreted. This concerns images, words, gestures and actions. When I read a book or a study or make observations, for example, the information allows for different interpretations. Interpretations are therefore necessary to determine whether statements are true and whether they meet the individual's need for truth. Information is only believed and accepted by people if it is considered to be true. Information that is considered incorrect is not accepted. It is taken note of, but not acted upon.

Truth is at the basis of every person's existence. People cannot - and this is not a question of will - accept information that they do not believe to be true. One can only accept a lie if he regards it as truth. Consequently, he needs an absolute, immutable, unchangeable standard for evaluating information in order to be certain. Of course, he can also use a changeable, moveable standard, but then his conclusion is uncertain and can get him into great difficulties. Later I will go into detail about the process of recording information.

First of all, the two different scales:

1. The objective standard something unchanging that is not subject to change.

  1. Nature's basic law of cause and effect, which cannot be suspended at any time by any circumstance.
  2. The composition of an element, structure, sequence of components in a basic building unit.
  3. The function of an element is defined from the outset and relates to the design.
  4. The basic needs of every element and living being cannot be changed and are fixed from the outset.

2. The subjective standard something changeable that does not always remain constant.

  1. Language and grammar are different in different cultures.
  2. The experts, scientists, the opinion of one or another.
  3. Existing prior knowledge that is already believed to be true.

In relation to humans, only the objective standard can be used to reliably find the cause of disease. Since life and health are objective things, it should not be a variable standard. After all, if fixed, unchangeable standards such as meters and kilograms are used when building a house, then all the more so when it comes to something much more important, namely one's own life.

So, what is it that I have taken as the basis for my studies? The basic law of cause and effect, the knowledge of the human being - structure, functions, basic needs. My conclusions in this book are based on these unchangeable facts.

„Basic law“ of nature

The universe is incomprehensibly large. Nevertheless, we can understand general principles with what we experience with our senses. I have found a connection that I like to call the "basic law of the universe". All elements in the microcosm and macrocosm can only function under this law. It consists of two simple and easily comprehensible principles. It states that nothing exists or functions by itself and nothing is made for itself (for its own benefit).

The left-hand side describes an unavoidable, ever-present dependence on other things or people. As a simple example, a tablet cannot function without electricity. The electrical current consumed is therefore the/a cause of the function. The right-hand side, Nothing can do something for itself, represents the effect, which is never about the channel itself. The tablet in the example performs a certain service, but it is not there for itself and cannot do anything for itself.

It follows from these two principles that every element functions down to the smallest level as a channel with an input and an output. It must "take" a substance such as energy at the input, use it and "give" it back in some modified form at the output. A channel should not become blocked, otherwise its function is disrupted or terminated.

The human being as a whole can also be described very appropriately as a channel. It is made up of many individual elements, which in turn each function as a smaller channel. An illness is an effect and as a doctor I have to find out where the cause lies. According to the basic law, no effect can arise without a cause. This is a simple but important principle that should not be neglected.

Another crucial aspect of the Basic Law is that cause and effect can never be the same thing. Cause and effect do not coincide. Where the energy is taken from, the same element cannot pass it on. The separation of cause and effect is demonstrated by the fact that the output and input of a channel are always at opposite points or ends. A cause can therefore not become an effect. Something that causes the disease cannot be the disease itself. If the cause could coincide with the effect, then what causes the disease could also be the disease itself. However, this is not possible.

What sometimes leads to the false conclusion that the cause can be an effect is overlooking the fact that the channels are set up one after the other and in a shared system, one channel is dependent on the correct functioning of the previous channel. If one channel is blocked, this affects the whole system. If one channel, e.g. the stomach, can only partially absorb food, this affects all subsequent channels in the body. If the stomach can only absorb a small amount at the inlet, it naturally only passes on a small amount at the outlet. Now you could say that the reduced supply from the stomach is the cause of the other deficiencies in the body. But then the question remains as to why the stomach is impaired. Where is the beginning of the process that subsequently affects the whole body?

Another example of how cause and effect are always different in a channel is the case of a chain of dominoes. They are lined up one behind the other and when the first domino is pushed, they fall in order. The first domino takes on the energy - the cause - and passes it on by falling over - the effect. If it is close to another domino, the latter takes over the energy and passes it on. Each channel does the same, it takes from the previous one and gives it to the next one - and this could go on forever if there were an infinite number of dominoes in a row. Energy is not lost; it is only transformed. Seen as a single channel, each domino "does" the same thing, it takes and gives. However, where it takes, it gives nothing back, but gives elsewhere (to the following domino) and this is unchangeable. So, the cause lies where the first domino in the chain absorbs the energy. Therefore, it was very important for me to recognize the place in the human being where the energy is absorbed and where the first channel is activated.

Since everything is built in the basic form of a channel, it is logical that everything in a system can only function in a cycle. If you look at our solar system, it quickly becomes clear that all elements in a cycle are interdependent. The sun, moon, earth and planets are interdependent. On Earth, the interdependence of all living beings and elements can be observed in the form of the ecosystem. The principle of the cycle is omnipresent, for example in the air in the form of high-altitude winds or in the currents of the oceans.

What is remarkable about the cycles is that they must end where they begin. A memorable example is the water cycle, which begins in the sea and ends there. On its long journey through this cycle, water is the basis for the diverse life of humans, plants and animals. We also have many cycles in our bodies, e.g. the blood cycle, which begins in the heart and ends there again.

Each channel is functionally designed to pass on everything it has absorbed. What would happen if the stomach kept a small part of the food for itself? We would die, at least after a certain time. How much oxygen do the lungs keep for themselves during the breathing process? None, because in healthy lungs all the oxygen is passed on to the blood. The law and the design do not allow anything else. And this applies in general, i.e. also to the individual cell. Nature works according to simple, beautiful and easily understandable principles that can be recognized if you look closely enough.